Course Leader:

prof.em.dr.arh. Cristina-Olga Gociman

Learning outcomes:

- Understanding the identity of the built space as an interpolation of the cultural, functional, affiliation, perception and affective resource value.
- Expanding the notion of vulnerability, from that of insecurity, to the capacity of exposed elements to respond to the challenges of hazard.
- Understanding the issue of disaster risk reduction management as a necessity of sustainable development.
- Identification and development of architecture and urban planning strategies in reducing the disaster risk of the built space.

Content:

15. Functional Resource Value/Definitions/Classification.
16. The resource value of perception/affiliation/ The concept of place/ Mental map - Associations of heritage meaning/ Topo-spatial identity/ Resource value of affectivity, experience, emotion/ Permanent re-reading of space/ Amnesia of negative experiences and remembering positive ones/ Transference emotional of the community/Direct and mediated perception.
17. Status Resource Value/Definition/Components
18. Vulnerability/Definition/Classification/Seismic Vulnerability/Expert Calculation/ Observational/ Evolutionary Assessment/ Statistics.
19. Types of intervention in the built space / Conservative maintenance / Improvement - restoration - rehabilitation / Transformation - reconstruction, demolition, new intervention.
20. Risk (direct and indirect losses)/Definition/Risk assessment
21. Risk scenarios/Typologies.
22. Disaster risk reduction management/ International approaches/ Analysis of global stages.
23. Risk reduction measures/structural/non-structural.
24. Sustainable design of the territory and urban space exposed to risk.
25. Establishing the post-disaster population resettlement typology/Emergency shelter/Temporary shelter/Temporary housing/Permanent housing.
26. The emergency/organization/conversion/accessibility hub.
27. Permanent space – security carrier/object/neighborhoods/intervention strategies.
28. Conclusions/ Process steps/ Disaster risk reduction strategies/ Urbasrisk approach.

Teaching Method:

Hybrid: - Physical or online course;
- Dialogue;
- PowerPoint presentation;
- Individual research reports.

Assessment:

Integration of hearing, involvement, response through reports.

Bibliography:

1. Aristotle Fizica Cartea VI, Traducere si note H.I. Barbu, Ed. Stiintifica, Bucuresti, 1966 (In Romanian);
2. Arup Rockfeller competition (2005) – The city resilience framework CRF, https://goo.gl/rmA6cA;
3. Bălan, St. Cristescu, V. Cornea, I. (Coordonatori)(1982): Cutremurul de pământ din România din 4 martie 1977, Ed. Academiei, Bucuresti;
4. Balassanian Sergiei, Cisternas Armando, Melkumyan Mikael (2000) - Earthquake hazard and seismic risk reduction;
5. Balteanu D., (1992), Natural hazard in Romania, RRGeogr., 36, Bucuresti, pp47-57.
6. Balteanu,D., Alexe, Radita (2001), Hazarde naturale si antropogene, Edit. Corint, pp. 110.
7. Bartolaso Guido, Boeri Stefano, 2010, The Maddalena Effect: An Architectural Affair , Rem Koolhaas (Editor)
8. Barakat, S. (2003). Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster. London: Overseas Development Institute
9. Bowerman B., Braverman J., Taylor H., Todosow V van Winmersperg (2000) – “The Vision of a Smart City” – presented at the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop. Paris, France, September 28, 2000
10. Blaga, L., Trilogia culturii, Editura pentru Literatură Universală: București, 1969. (In Romanian)
11. Blessing C. A., 1960, Perception on planning, J of Amer. Institute of Planners, 16 February, pp. 2-4
12. Cartier, S., Vallette, C., Mediene, H., 2012, “Urban Seismomorphoses Seismic Vulnerabilities, an Embarrassing Legacy”, Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, Vol. 2, No. 2 (August 2012), 96-106. Published by Atlantis Press. Retrieved on April 6, 2012 from www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=2940 - https://goo.gl/NN5cht
13. Cavalcanti, Maria, 1992, Totalitarian states and their influence on city-form: the case of Bucharest, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 9 (4): 275-286.
14. Călărașu E. (2012). Microzonarea condițiilor locale de teren pentru municipiul București și zona sa metropolitană cu aplicații în evaluarea hazardului seismic. Teza de doctorat, UTCB.
15. Choay F.Alegoria patrimoniului, Editura Simetria, Bucharest, 1998 (In Romanian)
16. Crișan, Rodica, Analiza integrativă a valorii culturale și de utilizare a clădirilor existente. Editura Universitară “Ion Mincu”, 2004.
17. Daniel Félix, Jorge M. Branco, Artur Feio, Temporary housing after disasters: A state of the art survey, http://download.xuebalib.com/xuebalib.com.17951.pdf
18. David E. Alexander (2002) - Principles of emergency planning and management, Oxford
19. Dufrenne M., Fenomenologia experienței estetice, Editura Meridiane: București, 1976. (In Romanian)
20. Eliade, M., Tratat de istoria religiilor. Editura Humanitas: București, 2013. (In Romanian)
21. FEMA (2005): Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards, Student Manual, FEMA 154-SM, Edition 2 / July
22. Ferreira, A., Emotions in planning practice: A critical review and suggestion for future developments based on mindfulness. Town Planning Review, 2013.
23. Gehl Jan, 1971, Life between buildings: Using public space, Danish Architectural Press, Copenhagen 1971
24. Gehl, J. Live between buildings: using public space. Islands Press, 2011
25. Giurescu D. C., The Razing of Romania’s past, 1989, A Project of the Kress Foundation European Preservation Program of the World Monuments Fund, World Monuments Fund, New York, N.Y., US/ICOMOS, United States Committee, International Council on Monuments and Sites, Washington, D.C., ISBN 0-911697-04-7;
26. Giovinazzi, Sonia and Lagomarsino Sergio, 2006 – Damage assessment of current buildings at territorial scale: A mechanical model Calibrated on a macroscopic vulnerability model, University of Genova, Switzerland
27. Glade Thomas, Albini Paola, Francés Félix - The use of historical data in natural hazard assessments, 2001
28. Gociman Cristina Olga (2006) - Managementul reducerii riscului la dezastre. Strategii de arhitectura si urbanism, Bucuresti
29. Gociman, Georgescu, S.R., Florescu, T. (2016): Strategii, reziliențe în reducerea riscului la multihazard, Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu”, București
30. Gociman Cristina Olga (2000)- Tipologia hazardului si dezvoltarea durabila. Generalitati, concept, problematica, Bucuresti
31. Gociman, C.O. et al, 2012-2016, URBASRISK, Project “Urban Blocks in Central Protected Area in Multiple Hazard Approach – Assessment, Mapping and Strategies for Risk Mitigation. Case Study: Bucharest Destructured Zone by Razing Occurring in the Communist Period”, 2012-2016, UAUIM Urban INCERC and UEFISCDI Agency, 2012, http://www.uauim.ro/cercetare/urbasrisk/en/
32. Harisson, James D. si Haward, William A., Rolul semnificatiei in imaginea urbana, retiparit din Ambient si comportament” (Environment and Behaviour), volumul 4, nr. 4 (decembrie 1972) cu permisiunea editorului, Sage Publication, Inc.
33. Hegel, R George Wilhelm Friederich-Volesungen uber die Philosophie der Geschichte (Prelegeri de filozofia a istoriei 1822-1831) (In Romanian)
34. Heidegger. M., Ființă și timp, Editura Humanitas, București, 2012. (In Romanian)
35. Hillman, M (1996). In favour of the Compact City, in Jenks, M., Burton, E.& Williams, K (eds). The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, E and F N Spon: London
36. Holling, C.S. (1973), Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems, Annu Rev. Ecol. Syst, vol 4
37. Holl Steven (2014), Cuestiones de perception
38. Johnson, C. (2008). Strategies for the reuse of temporary housing. In I.a. Ruby (Ed.), Urban transformation (pp. 323e331). Berlin: Ruby Press.
39. Joseph Muntanola Thornbery – Towoard an Architectural Design Epistemiology Regard as a place creation Activity
40. Liiceanu, G., Despre limită. Editura Humanitas: București, 2019. (In Romanian)
41. Lynch, K., (1960). The image of the City, Cambridge, Mass. Technology Press and Harvard University Press
42. Natiunile Unite, Brundtland Report (1987)– “Our common future”, The World Commission on Environment and developments.
43. Norberg - Schulz, Chr.; (1971), Existence, space and architecture, Studio Vista Books, London
44. Pallasmaa Juhani, ”Mâna care gândește””Thinking hand”, 2009.
45. Pandele, A., Bucureștiul mutilat, Editura Humanitas: București, 2018.
46. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Childers DL et al (2016) Evolution and future of urban ecological science: ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosyst Health Sustain 2:e01229
47. Reijndrop, A., Maarten, H., In search of the new public domain. Analysis and strategy, NAI publishers, Rotterdam, 2001
48. Saaby Tina – Adress to the Academy of Urbanism Congress 2013, 15-17 May 2013, Bradford, UK
49. Sandi, H., Pomonis, A., Francis, S., Georgescu, E. S., Mohindra, R., Borcia, I. S. : A.: Seismic Vulnerability Assessment. Methodological Elements And Applications To The Case Of Romania. Constructii. Nr. 2 / 2008
50. Senday Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030), Conferinta Mondiala ONU 14-18 martie 2015, Sendai, Japonia
51. Schachtel, E. G., Metamorphosis: On the development of affect, perception, attention, and memory, Basic Books:New York, 1959.
52. Schneid Thomas D., Collins Larry (2001) - Disaster management and preparedness
53. Whitman, R. and Cornell C. A.(1976): Design, in: Seismic risk and engineering decisions, edited by: Lomnitz, C. and Rosenblueth, E., Elsevier, Amsterdam – Oxford – New York
54. Wolpert, J. (1966), “Migration as an adjustment to environmental Stress”, in Journal of Social Issues
55. World Heritage Committee, Strategy for Reducing Risks from Disasters at World Heritage properties, Christchurch, 2007.